Think Before You Sink

February 25th, 2005

Some general advice to developers, well people everywhere, about being abusive on forums. While I agree in the sanctity of one’s office, bedroom or garden shed it may appear that some high ground or victory has elevated one’s status to demi-god of geeky ‘I know the specs-ness’ those barbs and taunts are being indexed by Google and MSN and kept in other web site archives. Its sound advice to remember this before calling someone an idiot, for instance, or criticising your boss or calling your client any name other than the one they arrived in your office with - because they or the next customer may just Google your name and find out what is out there. For instance, you might apply for a good job oneday or want to create business partnerships.

Good PR and marketing is more than the face you put on for the office.

Jobs In the Mill

February 24th, 2005

Recently I’ve agreed to do a free(ish) site for the Hunter Island Press Inc who are trying to get off the ground. Maybe there’ll be money in it but maybe not and its not about that. Its about giving back to the community and having a diverse society that isn’t as bland as the local poster-cum-print shop. So its definately a spot to look out for some development. When the first round of meetings give me more to put forward I’ll have more to say, obviously.

Another project I’m kind of working on behind the scenes is IMEMS Pty Ltd T/as Paul Anderson and Associates, from Palmwoods QLD, who are environmental advisers to businesses around the country. As well we’re developing for them their Harvest Supplies site which distributes Lallemands products in QLD and sells enzymes and so forth for brewing and wine making. Its a long haul job though and hopefully after a meeting in a month or so with them in Sydney we should have some decent direction and a bit of content to start pulling the designs together into a proper solution.

My friend Mike Marinos approached me with an interesting project too this week, an interactive wildlife site for people to report sightings of endangered species. Sounds cool if it comes off and by all reports the Parks and Wildlife are interested in the concept. Can’t say more as its not my idea and it’d be unfair to Mike in this early stage to paint any clearer picture.

Moreover there’s the recent death of Pig Folio so Muerto for that one. We had to kill it off in-house for its pig-ugliness and accept it was purely experimental and lacked any concept of real design. So Pig Folio is being redesigned into a simple but classy white portfolio and resume I can show clients independently instead of via the hard sell of the commercial website.

On top of that there’s the next evolution brewing of Translucent, but we won’t go into that. I’ve just put RSS on there and would like to create dynamic PNGs and a few other things. Nothing major, don’t worry Lindy I won’t trash your blog while you’re out of town.

So basically things are getting busier at Norty Pig but not busy enough. We’re welcoming new projects so get in contact with us. If its cool and especially if its different we’d love to give it a go. Oh and a sense of humour is a must in this business…

WordPressing the Easy Way

February 23rd, 2005

The first time I looked at WordPress I thought ‘how can I change your stylesheets’ and it was an icky pain in the butt. I figure a few people have probably looked at these kinds of integrations and either found them difficult or even given in. Really its a piece of cake if you just do the following:

First develop a page layout with whatever you want it to look like, basically the whole kit and kaboodle.

Second download the index.php file and do some stuff. Cut and paste all of the head section and the confusing bunch of php function calls into your version of index.php. Its cool here to comment them out and make sure your page validates.

Then change the calls in the head to link to your own stylesheets and start uncommenting a few of those functions like search, calendar or the WordPress links. And that’s about it you’re done. Fully functional and your own design.

While its no major drama integrating like this its probably counter-intuitive in one aspect. Probably most people would originally start the other way around trying to mould WordPress to fit them. What can I say? Simple, effective and I’ve got the RSS, search and so forth with minimal effort. And I know what you’re thinking, hey you already know this. Its the others who can use the tip.

We Don’t Do Budget Designs

February 22nd, 2005

As an emerging small web design firm trying to get established its quite hard coming to terms with the budget market. All I can say is that I neither want Norty Pig to compete at budget rates or for us to produce shoddy undocumented and unsound web solutions. Whether its pride, personal ethics, or simply the ambition to take us to a more viable level of web development its a given that eventually we’ll either be submitting quotes for larger more lucrative work or simply sit in the background doing our own thing as freelancers. The third option is for some larger company to hire us directly and make us rich without the accounting paperwork.

Budget designers on the other hand offer a service that doesn’t give documentation, ignores information architecture, omits persona and user profiles, and so many other essential pieces of the web designer’s arsenal. Of course the budget designer can have you up in a week and you have, to all intensive purposes, the navigation bar and the picture of your main office, but to what effect? I really do think you get what you pay for in this business. Unfortunately the budget market itself is so competitive they tend to push each other into starvation wages which creates a situation where quite a few potential clients expect to be quoted far less.

So I guess what I’m saying is there’s at least two and probably ten different levels of web design depending on the skills of the organisation, their experience and the extent they are willing to go to give you the site you really need. I can’t make sites for $500 but then I really don’t want to so I guess its fine if someone else does. But, of course, if you have a spare $3,000 and (way) up we can start talking about web ’solutions’.

RSS 2.0 on Linden’s Blog

February 20th, 2005

This article only applies to RSS .9x and RSS 2.0.

The RSS ‘thang’ is a must have on any site nowdays if you have any kind of dynamic content and don’t we all know it. Generally all I’ve done in the past is utilise the WordPress feeds though and never really looked into just ‘how’ simple Really Simple Syndication can be to implement by hand. OK there’s the manual update that takes a couple of minutes but hey this is a geeky blog right?! And its nearly always better to do something by hand at least once to understand what it’s really doing down there (excuse the pun).

On Linden Langdon’s blog, Translucent, this week we decided to implement just such a hand made RSS 2.0 feed and submit it to the feed eating world. Basically although I developed the site Linden is responsible for updating and manually validating the content and RSS feed by herself. While the rest of the world (now including me) hooks into automated blogging software some people like to have a nice home brewed personal blog experience including writing content into the page in straight XHTML and manipulating Cascading Style Sheets. Something I liken to the difference between buying a fibreglass dinghy and hand crafting one from good huon pine. The craft in the craft so to speak.

The best and really best way to start looking at making RSS of the .9x or 2.0 variety is the Harvard Law Blog, which might sound counter-intuitive at first. But try not to be disappointed when you see that all these gains are made with such little effort and skill. Really Simple Syndication is really simple.

Unless you want to chase up the RSS 1.0 spec which is based on RDF - but that’s another story.

Semantics vs Design

February 19th, 2005

Its a constant in this business that if you say one thing or another either side of the argument will beat you senseless and take your dignity like its an Unreal Tournament game of Capture the Flag. One of those minefields is to mention the XHTML word in front of the wrong audience who’ll crunch your skull and flay your bacon just for the internal insanity of it all. So with some trepidation I embark on the line of the semantics vs design issue.

For the most part I like the idea of a semantic web and in all sincerity I do try to be as semantic in my approach to marking up pages as possible without becoming just that little bit too anal for my own good. Often in real life you come to a fork - semantics or kick arse design - although they are not always exclusive of course. Sometimes you just want it to work like you saw it in your head regardless of best practise. So what am I on about?

Ahhh of course this cool method of elegantly wrapping a space character in paragraph tags floated to the left and given differing widths. I guess you need to go to What Can I Do and look under the hood in view source. By floating the paragraphs (or divs for that matter) you can quite unsemantically create cool text effects like wrap content in a curve around an image, something particularly handy in some situations. So perhaps I’m a novice, naive or just dumb but for works in the trenches its really a handy little bit of extra markup whichever way you go. Please don’t hunt me down and beat me senseless though…. pleeeassssseeeeee..

Norty Pig Version 6

February 16th, 2005

Well from my reckoning its version six - Norty Pig. Minimalist, slightly interactive, featuring my digital photography in a small random fade in banner, xhtml 1.0 with css, tableless layout as per usual. Keep an eye on the variation of images as I still have to increase the number of images in the array… less boxey perhaps or just a smaller box? Is my left brain slowly waking up?

Project New

February 15th, 2005

Kevin Leitch is offering up a great resource for the new web designer or designers new to the web standards approach in the form of a course called Project New. Issue One is out at the moment so its a good time to have a look if you’re one who’s never taken the big step out of tag soup. I really can’t encourage you enough.

That said I note the comments on several well known standards blogs recently about some of us bloggers not offering original content and simply referring to links - ie other peoople’s original content, so I’m tentatively putting up Project New in the hope I won’t be stoned or summarily castrated by my fellow designers here. By original content I must add that its nearly all been said before and if only one of us can say it once then its time we stopped blogging here and now. I guess its up to you, the blog reader, audience, purveyor of electronic comment. I hope the links I do suggest lead budding and intermediate web designers on a course to better information, simple word of mouth.

fluxx, Brother Jones and Rammstein

February 12th, 2005

On the front end of sites I like on this day is fluxx by BJ Cook, a subscriber to the Web Standards Group mailing list. It shows the direction I’d like to take Norty Pig if only a decent graphic artist with web experience were to happen along. Three ticks to BJ for keeping it cool under the hood too.

Another couple I think are interesting are Brother Jones Artworks and in a totally sick sort of way Rammstein, although for the latter I kind of liked the music which helped.

I’m just sure there’s more out there than single header picture with chunks of plain text…

When Shite Be Big Brown Shite

February 11th, 2005

Often when small businesses are confronted with the idea of whether or not to get a web solution they either don’t see the value in it (’Oh I was thinking under $500′) or they don’t know how to judge the actual value of the product. To many businesses it comes down to asking what will I get for $4,000 that I won’t get for $400? Or similarly, a family friend had been fielding quotes for a site to represent a national company and he emailed me that the quotes ranged from $8,000 to $80,000. Now thats a lot of pressure to be under when you don’t know whats going on under the hood or are not as web sophisticated as say another developer.

So here is what I really don’t like. I don’t like people who use FrontPage 5.0 like its Publisher, who don’t know about web technologies, who can’t be bothered learning about how to maximise the clients potential, who have bugger all time to think about information architecture and documentation, who have not improved or changed what they do or how they do it for the last x number of years, who misrepresent themselves and what they can and can’t provide clients, who don’t want to be better at what they do, and who charge a few hundred dollars for a four page site.

I can see the point for a mini league but I’ve never played in one and figure after about grade 6 I’d outgrown the opportunity. What do I have to offer? The fact I will always be better next year is a fair indication that I’m at least interested in my work.

Page: 1 | ... | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62