skip to main content skip to content rich footer

RSS Icon - subscribe to the RSS 2.0 Feed

Cathay Pacific: XHTML?

Adaptive Path had a lot - I’m not sure how much - input to this project”

Has anyone been over to the new Cathay Pacific site? It does look nice and I found it on a site plug from Firewheel Design last week so I had quite high expectations. After all - its Cathay Pacific! Y’know bigtime. What’s also bigtime is the legendary crew over at Adaptive Path had a lot - I’m not sure how much - input to this project.

From the little guy - me - in the backwoods I’d like to mention a couple of little things where Cathay Pacific’s new redesign fails dismally. I’d regard Cathay Pacific as a sacred cow in the industry simply because it was touched by the almighty hands of Adaptive Path by the way. I’m sure we’ll see very little criticism of their site on standardista blogs. Fortunately I’m irreverent when it comes to this…

The validator spits out 370 validator errors on the english language home page with a brave XHTML 1.0 Doctype! That’s 370 and we aren’t talking ampersands. There are missing alt attributes on images, nobody has figured out onClick should be onclick in XHTML, elements aren’t closed properly, id gets redefined multiple times on the page, tables using bgColor, orphaned end tags for table rows - it makes my eyes sore looking through the 545 instances of the validator’s output.

Why put an XHTML 1.0 Strict Doctype on something if its never intended to meet the specification? I’m perplexed at this especially due to the Adaptive Path element of the equation.

Have a look at the source code - its almost entirely except for a few final lines a javascript tome. In fact and of course the page is worthless without JavaScript enabled.

I could sit here all day bitching about Cathay Pacific and the way the web standards community might be reticent to point to its own - but apart from the rather pleasant facade I’m stretched to see how it can’t be noticed. Cathay Pacific are a high enough profile to appear on the WaSP radar I’d expect. With any luck Joe Clark will pick it up for his failed redesign series but beyond that I expect most of the standardistas will tell Adaptive Path they did a mighty fine job flying the banner.

Does this sound like a harsh appraisal of a very successful big gun in the industry? If its not true, if any of its not true, feel free to explain how in future iterations of the site they’re going to throw out the tables, JavaScript, and all of the hoo-ha. I’ll listen.

Or is it because validation has had a kick in the arse in the future Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2 so it will no longer be necessary?

No the validator isn’t the be all and end all of the evaluation but its a great tool for looking under the hood at the nuts and bolts that drive a site like this. In short Cathay Pacific - the redesign is crap. Enjoy your pats on the back from the web community at large but I see you for the spiritless entity you’ve become. Asta la vista baby.

Oh and just change that Doctype back to a HTML Transitional and you’re over many of those validation errors. Why be an imposter when its so obvious what you really coded?

Update: 2/6/06
I should add that Adaptive Path’s new blog is well worth bookmarking. Paul Graham’s essay, linked to from their page - The Power of the Marginal - was one of the best reads I’ve had in a long time. If you’re a small outsider you need to read this one.

The Cathay Pacific web site is inaccessible and nowhere near XHTML

If you thought this article was worthwhile you might like to submit it to del.icio.us or Digg or Furl or reddit.

Leave a Reply

Recent on Pig Pen

10 Questions For David Storey

July 21st, 2006

10 Questions For David Storey, Chief Web Opener at Opera Software, from the Web Standards Group.

Lost Any CSS Lately?

July 21st, 2006

Lost Any CSS Lately? - Andy Clarke has a dig back at Dvorak over that stupid anti-CSS article. Like a lot of people I just ignored the man for the sense he never made.

Google Accessible Search

July 21st, 2006

Google Accessible Search from Google Labs - designed to rank you higher if you provide content which is accessible to the visually impaired.

Scott Stulberg

July 21st, 2006

Scott Stulberg - awesome work and the music on the site is excellent. (via Coudal)

Photography by Scott Stulberg

New YouTube Policy

July 21st, 2006

New YouTube Policy - if you upload stuff they own it and can sell it on however they want and that sucks bigtime. Thumbs down.

Hiring Your First Employee

July 21st, 2006

Hiring Your First Employee is a crucial point. Firewheel Design 4 years ago was a spare bedroom freelance and now they're a 7 employee firm enjoying success. Some sound advice and a must read for all the freelancers out there wanting to grow.

One In Nine Brits Blog

July 21st, 2006

One In Nine Brits Blog - that's huge when you sit and think about it for a while.

20 Pro Tips For Web Designers

July 21st, 2006

20 Pro Tips For Web Designers from Jason Arber.

Pulse Trailer

July 21st, 2006

Pulse Trailer - one more reason to avoid email.

Pulse trailer

Search 2.0 Vs Traditional

July 21st, 2006

Search 2.0 Vs Traditional

Continue to Pig Pen or subscribe to the Pig Pen RSS feed.

Recent on Norty Pig

Mobile Marketing Overview

July 20th, 2006

MarketingSherpa's Mobile Marketing: Quick Overview of Options provides some insight on optimising for the mobile.

Mastering The Finish

July 19th, 2006

Blue Flavor's article - The Art of the Finish - gives twelve tips on how to ensure you do well on that difficult final 5% of a project.

Living With Great Designers

July 18th, 2006

Seth Godin's article - How to live happily with a great designer - emphasises you need to be a part of the process and have faith your designer knows his craft. After all you don't backseat drive your accountant do you?

Continue to Norty Pig or subscribe to the Norty Pig RSS feed.

Sitemap